Do not confuse the cancellation of purchase restrictions with the introduction of car incentive policies

Recently, several major ministries and commissions such as the Ministry of Industry and Information Technology and the National Development and Reform Commission held a special conference on the automotive industry. After the meeting, the rumors about encouraging the introduction of policies were announced. Since then, the question of whether or not an incentive policy for the auto industry should be introduced has triggered continuous debates in the industry and the media. In this wave of debate, more voices tend not to rashly introduce encouraging policies. However, due to confusing the cancellation of purchase restrictions with encouragement policies, this debate is developing in the direction of misleading the public.

At present, the encouraging policy of the outside world is that the energy-saving subsidies have been increased by 10%, and the elimination subsidies for old vehicles have increased. Other policies have also been reported from time to time. For encouraging policies, we should look at them in two ways. Under the current background of inflation, long-term measures to reduce the tax burden of the people can be fully considered, such as purchase taxes and vehicle and boat taxes. Also, if the subsidy, especially in the basic R&D area, clearly has a positive impact on the enhancement of national competitiveness. However, if only some short-term stimulus policies, it is recommended that relevant departments should be cautious.

For the automotive industry, where is the short-term stimulus policy?

First of all, overdraft consumption in the future will inevitably cause tight supply in the market. The result of disordered market order will inevitably increase waiting time for queuing, increase dealers' chance of starting prices from their seats, infringe consumers' rights and interests, and second, give wrong signals to manufacturers. It is easy to create a new wave of production capacity. Ultimately, it wastes national resources, and companies are ups and downs, which is detrimental to the local economy.

However, we should be aware that the cancellation of restriction or prohibition of purchase restriction is not part of the incentive policy, and encouragement policy should be cautious, but we should undoubtly give both hands vigorously in favor of canceling the restriction purchase, although the short-term purchase limit measures in Beijing are not too May be canceled. Restrictions on purchasing are administrative orders and non-market activities, so even if the blockage effect is good, it should not be encouraged. What's more, at present, there is almost no effect on blockage. A few days ago, the Beijing Municipal Traffic Committee had hung up an investigation on the official website to solicit opinions on blockage, but most people did not agree with the effect of restrictions on the blockage. In this context, the relevant departments have not complied with public opinion and, at the appropriate time, banned the purchase restriction policy, allowing the market to regulate supply and demand itself. Under the market economy, the purchase of this is the basic rights of the people. I have money, there is a car on the market, my car has the ability to get on the road, and the management department should give me a license. This is a matter of righteousness and righteousness. Old talk, no longer go into details.